• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

大脑中动脉供血区单发性皮质下小梗死与动脉主干病变的相关性:前瞻性病例系列研究

Correlation between single small subcortical infarction and artery stem lesions in middle cerebral artery territory: a prospective case series study

摘要:

目的 探讨大脑中动脉(middle cerebral artery,MCA)穿支供血区域内单发性皮质下小梗死(single small subcortical infarction,SSSI)的临床特征和可能机制.方法 连续前瞻性纳入急性SSSI患者,根据病灶部位与MCA的关系将SSSI的分布模式分为近端SSSI(proximal SSSI,pSSSI)和远端SSSI(distal SSSI,dSSSI).比较2组患者的人口统计学、症状、影像学检查结果和相关危险因素的差异.结果 共纳入209例SSSI患者,其中pSSSI组86例,dSSSI组123例.单因素分析显示,pSSSI组病灶直径显著性大于dSSSI组[(14.97±3.14)mm对(11.46± 3.42)mm; t=7.551,P=0.000],糖尿病(25.6%对13.8%;x2=4.612,P=0.032)、高脂血症(32.6%对20.3%;x2=4.001,P=0.045)、同侧MCA狭窄(46.5%对17.1%;x2=21.222,P=0.000)、其他颅内动脉狭窄(45.3%对20.3%;x2=14.918,P=0.000)以及颅外动脉狭窄(26.7%对11.4%;x2 =8.198,P=0.004)患者的构成比显著性高于dSSSI组,但高血压(69.8%对82.1%;x2=4.361,P=0.037)和白质疏松(24.4%对48.8%;x2=12.655,P=0.000)患者的构成比显著性低于dSSSI组.多变量logistic回归分析显示,病灶同侧MCA狭窄[优势比(odds ratio,0R)2.796,95%可信区间(confidence interval,CI)1.258 ~6.214;P=0.012]、其他颅内动脉狭窄(OR2.690,95% CI 1.251 ~5.783;P =0.011)、白质疏松(OR0.442,95% CI 0.212~0.922;P =0.030)以及病灶直径(OR 1.285,95% CI1.155 ~ 1.429;P=0.000)与pSSSI独立相关.结论 依据病灶部位与MCA的关系进行分类的SSSI的临床特征不同,提示SSSI的分布模式可能反映其潜在的发病机制:穿支动脉供血近端区域的SSSI可能是大动脉病变所致,而远端区域的SSSI则更多是小动脉病变所致.

更多
abstracts:

Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and possible mechanisms of the single small subcortical infarction (SSSI) of middle cerebral artery (MCA) within the perforating area.Methods The patients with acute SSSI were enrolled consecutively and retrospectively.The distribution patterns of SSSI were divided into proximal SSSI (pSSSI) and distal SSSI (dSSSI) according to the relationship between the lesion sites and MCA.The differences of demographics,symptoms,imaging findings and related risk factor were compared in patients of both groups.Results A total of 209 patients with SSSI were enrolled.There were 86 patients in the pSSSI group and 123 in the dSSSI group.Univariate analysis showed that the lesion diameter in the pSSSI group was significantly greater than that in the dSSSI group (14.97±3.14 mmvs.11.46±3.42 mm; t=7.551,P=0.000),and the composition ratios in patients in diabetes mellitus (25.6% vs.13.8%;x2 =4.612,P =0.032),hyperlipidemia (32.6% vs.20.3% ; x2 =4.001,P =0.045),ipsilateral MCA stenosis (46.5% vs.17.l%,x2 =21.222,P<0.001),other intracranial arterial stenosis (45.3% vs.20.3%;x2=14.918,P<0.001),and extracranial artery stenosis (26.7% vs.11.4%;x2 =8.198,P=0.004) were significantly higher than those in the dSSSI group.However,the composition ratios in patients with hypertension (69.8% vs.82.1% ;x2 =4.361,P =0.037) and leukoaraiosis (24.4% vs.48.8% ;x2 =12.655,P <0.001)were significantly lower than those in the dSSSI group.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ipsilateral MCA stenosis of the lesion (odds ratio [OR] 2.796,95% confidence interval [CI] 1.258-6.214;P =0.012),other intracranial arterial stenosis (OR 2.690,95% CI 1.251-5.783; P=0.011),leukoaraiosis (OR 0.442,95% CI 0.212-0.922; P =0.030) and lesion diameter (OR 1.285,95% CI 1.155-1.429; P <0.001) were independently associated with pSSSI.Conelusions The clinical characteristics of SSSI are different in classification based on the relationship between the lesion sites and MCA,SSSI of proximal perforating artery may be caused by the large artery disease,and SSSI of the remote areas are mostly caused by small artery disease.

More
作者: 段作伟 [1] 孙文 [1] 黄志新 [1] 蔡乾坤 [1] 肖露露 [2] 陈响亮 [2] 曹立平 [1] 熊云云 [1] 徐格林 [1]
作者单位: 210002,南方医科大学南京临床医学院(南京军区南京总医院)神经内科 [1] 南京大学医学院临床学院(南京军区南京总医院)神经内科 [2]
栏目名称: 论著
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4165.2013.06.005
发布时间: 2013-09-10
基金项目:
江苏省自然科学基金重点研究专项 国家自然科学基金面上项目
  • 浏览:394
  • 下载:157

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷