• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

18F-FDG符合线路显像最大标准摄取值在胃癌评估中的价值

Analysis of 18F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value in gastric cancer with coincidence imaging

摘要:

目的 研究18 F-FDG符合线路显像SUVmax在胃癌评估中的意义.方法 回顾性分析92例胃部疾病患者[男60例,女32例,平均年龄65 (32~85)岁;其中胃癌78例].78例胃癌中,残胃癌3例、原发性胃癌75例(Tis期4例、T1期13例、T2期9例、T3期33例、T4期11例,5例未手术);高分化腺癌22例,中分化腺癌15例,低分化腺癌28例.采用ROI技术分析图像并计算SUVmax,分别用视觉法与SUVmax分析18F-FDG符合线路显像资料,并以组织病理学或活组织检查结果为标准计算两者检验效能.使用ROC曲线分析评价SUVmax;采用Pearson相关分析评估SUVmax与病灶大小的关系,Wilcoxon秩和检验分析SUVmax在进展期胃癌和早期胃癌的差异,Kruskal-Wallis检验分析SUVmax与不同分化程度腺癌的关系.结果 18F-FDG符合线路显像视觉法与SUVmax诊断胃癌的灵敏度均为64.1%(50/78),特异性均为64.3%(9/14),准确性均为64.1% (59/92).SUVmaxROC AUC为0.695,最佳临界值为0.700;SUVmax与病灶最大径呈正相关(r=0.489,P<0.001),Tis~1期病灶SUVmax(0.676± 1.288)与T2-4期SUVmax(3.851±3.764)差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.754,P<0.001),而高、中、低分化腺癌间SUVmax(分别为2.805±4.008,3.447±2.365,3.413±3.737)差异无统计学意义(x2=2.459,P>0.05).结论 在18F-FDG符合线路显像评估胃癌中,SUVmax较视觉法提供了更多的信息,但其与胃癌T分期、组织学类型、分化程度等的关系需进一步研究.

更多
abstracts:

Objective To investigate the value of 18F-FDG SUVmax in gastric cancer diagnosis with coincidence imaging.Methods The coincidence imaging was performed in 92 patients with gastric diseases (60 males,32 females,age 65 (32-85) years; 78 malignant cases,14 benign cases).The malignant cases included 3 remnant gastric cancers and 75 primary gastric cancers (staging: 4 of Tis,13 of T1,9 of T2,33 of T3,11 of T4 and 5 without surgery).The well-,moderately-and poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas were 22,15 and 28,respectively.Images were analyzed retrospectively with visual method and 18F-FDG SUVmax,and the diagnostic results were compared with the histopathological findings.The ROC curve was used to analyze the SUVmax.The Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between SUVmax and tumor size.The Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied to determine the difference of SUVmax between early and advanced gastric cancers.The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the difference of SUVmax in various types of differentiated adenocarcinoma.Results No matter visual method or SUVmax was used,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of coincidence imaging in diagnosis of gastric cancer were 64.1%(50/78),64.3%(9/14) and 64.1%(59/92),respectively.The AUC of SUVmax was 0.695 and the cut-off value was 0.700.SUVmax Was positively correlated with tumor size significantly(r=0.489,P<0.001).There was statistically significant difference between SUVmax of Tis-1 and that of T2-4(0.676± 1.288 vs 3.851 ±3.764;Z=-3.754,P<0.001).However,there was no statistically significant difference among SUVmax of various grades of differentiated adenocarcinoma(2.805±4.008,3.447±2.365,3.413± 3.737 ; x2 =2.459,P> 0.05).Conclusions SUVmax provides more information than visual method in assessing gastric cancer with 18F-FDG coincidence imaging.Appropriate cut-off value of SUV is necessary for improvement of the diagnostic efficiency.Relationships between SUV and pathological T stage,histopathological types and differentiation degree need further investigation.

More
  • 浏览:464
  • 下载:160

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷